Search Results for: cases

Litigation Tracker: Feds ask SCOTUS to vacate protections for TX’s razorwire; key deadlines loom in other cases  

It’s a new year and new developments in litigation we’re tracking are fully underway; see below for the latest in TX’s razorwire litigation and updates on key deadlines approaching in other important cases. And as always, you can check our microsite for the latest updates on extremist litigation challenging immigrant inclusive policies.  Biden Administration asks […]

Litigation Tracker: Feds ask SCOTUS to vacate protections for TX’s razorwire; key deadlines loom in other cases   Read More »

Contact

Joan Agoh

joan.agoh@justiceactioncenter.org

323-443-2681

Litigation Tracker: LA Judge Dismisses Suit Over Asylum Officer Regulation, Other Updates

See below for recent updates and upcoming decisions in extremist challenges to immigrant inclusive policies. As always, you can find more information about these and other cases on our microsite. 19-state challenge to asylum officer regulation dismissed for lack of standing Last week in the Western District of Louisiana, Judge Joseph dismissed for lack of

Litigation Tracker: LA Judge Dismisses Suit Over Asylum Officer Regulation, Other Updates Read More »

Litigation Tracker: Border Wall Intervenors; Razor Wire Back to the Fifth; TX wants CHNV Do-over

In addition to its usual showers and unusual celestial events, this April has also brought several developments in extremist litigation challenge immigrant-inclusive policies; and as usual, most of those developments are out of federal courts in Texas. See below and our microsite for the latest.  Applying border wall injunction gets messy, could stiff third parties

Litigation Tracker: Border Wall Intervenors; Razor Wire Back to the Fifth; TX wants CHNV Do-over Read More »

Litigation Tracker: While SB4 Ping-Pongs, DHS Ordered to Build Border Barriers & Razor Wire Case Gets Hearing

As we continue to celebrate a win defending the CHNV Parole Program, we’re also keeping track of developments in anti-immigrant legislation moving through the courts. For example, we’re processing the whiplash (administratively speaking) of Texas’s SB4, which was preliminarily enjoined on Feb. 29  by the district court; briefly allowed to go into effect by the

Litigation Tracker: While SB4 Ping-Pongs, DHS Ordered to Build Border Barriers & Razor Wire Case Gets Hearing Read More »

Federal Court Upholds Biden Immigration Parole Policy, Allows Thousands of Americans to Welcome Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans to the U.S. 

Version en español aquí FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 8, 2024 VICTORIA, TX — The federal district court for the Southern District of Texas ruled against states today in Texas v. DHS, a lawsuit that attempted to curtail the Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, Venezuela Humanitarian Parole program. The court found that states lacked standing to sue. Below

Federal Court Upholds Biden Immigration Parole Policy, Allows Thousands of Americans to Welcome Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans to the U.S.  Read More »

Seven program sponsors win case defending the freedom to welcome loved ones and global neighbors under the “CHNV” humanitarian parole program 

Contacts

Justice Action Center
323-450-7269
tasha.moro@justiceactioncenter.org

UCLA CILP
626-497-2341
burgess@law.ucla.edu

RAICES
832-299-8958
media@raicestexas.org

Litigation Tracker: Latest in TX & FL Suits regarding Asylum & Detention 

As we celebrate the just-issued preliminary injunction blocking Texas’s anti-immigrant SB4, see below (and our microsite) for other February developments in extremist litigation challenging immigrant-inclusive policies.  Judge Kacsmaryk denies motion to dismiss TX suit over asylum rule in 9-page opinion  In early February, Judge Kacsmaryk issued an opinion denying the Department of Justice’s motion to

Litigation Tracker: Latest in TX & FL Suits regarding Asylum & Detention  Read More »

Litigation Tracker Special Edition: How Red States are Repeating History   

This week we’re taking a break from our regular programming around red state litigation challenging federal immigrant-inclusive policies (as posted on our microsite) to examine a related topic: recent political ploys by extremist state politicians attempting to take immigration policy into their own hands—even when doing so is unlawful under controlling precedent.  Let’s start in

Litigation Tracker Special Edition: How Red States are Repeating History    Read More »

Scroll to Top