Svitlana Doe v. Noem (Humanitarian Parole Termination)

Class Action Alert

Certain beneficiaries and sponsors of CHNV, U4U, OAW, CAM, FRP, or MPIP humanitarian parole are protected as class members in our Svitlana Doe v. Noem lawsuit. Learn more and sign up for class member updates on our class action page.

For more than 70 years, Republican and Democratic administrations alike have used humanitarian parole processes to allow people to enter the country for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit. Now, in an unprecedented and unlawful move, the Trump administration is ending these critical processes—some of the last remaining safe and legal pathways for individuals to reach the United States—which will unnecessarily harm parole beneficiaries and sponsors, tear apart families and communities, and further weaken the U.S. economy.  

Eleven beneficiaries, seven sponsors, and organizational plaintiff Haitian Bridge Alliance—from Massachusetts, New York, Georgia, Nebraska, Wisconsin, California, and beyond—are suing the Trump Administration over its termination of these crucial humanitarian parole processes. These include: Central American Minors Parole, Family Reunification Parole, Military Parole-in-Place, Uniting for Ukraine, Operation Allies Welcome, and the processes for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans, known as “CHNV humanitarian parole”. Plaintiffs are also challenging the Administration’s order to USCIS to halt processing on all pending applications for these processes and any other alternative immigration benefits that may offer potential relief. We filed a motion for preliminary injunction asking the court to pause or temporarily block the government’s actions while the case moves through the courts. 

In 2023, Justice Action Center and partners successfully defended the CHNV humanitarian parole processes after they were challenged by Texas and other states. Now, in Svitlana, JAC and Human Rights First are representing clients who represent several more humanitarian parole processes. 

In claiming that “categorical” humanitarian parole programs are unlawful—despite the fact that administrations have used such “categorical” parole programs for the past 70 years—Trump is setting a dangerous precedent, attempting to limit the executive power of future presidents to create these beneficial legal pathways and depriving future generations of humanitarian parole.   

On March 25th, the Trump Administration published a Federal Register Notice (FRN) revoking the lawful status and work authorizations of hundreds of thousands of beneficiaries of the “CHNV” humanitarian parole process for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans. Key takeaways here.  On April 14th, the Judge issued an order temporarily blocking the FRN’s early terminations of CHNV parole nationwide and certified a class of all individuals who have received a grant of parole that is subject to the CHNV FRN, who are still in the United States, and who choose not to opt out of the class to seek relief in separate litigation.  

On May 28th, the Judge granted additional relief and certified additional classes, ordering that adjudication of the following applications resume for individuals nationwide who are currently in the country: (1) pending immigration benefits requests filed by people granted parole under the CHNV, Uniting for Ukraine, Operation Allies Welcome, Family Reunification Parole, Central American Minors, and Military Parole-in-Place (2) pending re-parole applications filed by people granted parole under programs with re-parole; and (3) initial MPIP applications.

So far, there have been hearings at the District Court of Massachusetts in Boston on: 3/24/2025, 4/7/2025, and 4/10/2025.

With regards to the judge’s April 14, 2025 order blocking the March 25, 2025 FRN’s early termination of all individual grants of CHNV parole, the government appealed and asked the First Circuit Court of Appeals to block the district court’s order while the appeal proceeds. After the First Circuit denied this request, the government asked the United States Supreme Court for the same thing. On May 30, 2025, unfortunately, the Supreme Court granted the government’s request to block the district court’s order while the appeal proceeds. The Supreme Court decision was short and provided no analysis or reasoning; Justice Jackson wrote in dissent and was joined by Justice Sotomayor. According to a USCIS alert on June 6th, this decision means DHS may now proceed with terminating parole granted under the CHNV parole programs and with revoking any employment authorization based on being paroled under the CHNV parole programs. CHNV parole beneficiaries whose parole is terminated and whose employment authorization is revoked will receive notification in their myUSCIS account. The appeal of the district court’s order will continue.

Press releases

News coverage

Case Info

Court: District of Massachusetts

Case No: 1:25-cv-10495

Date filed: 2/28/2025

Judge(s): Talwani

 

More Details, Court Filings, and More at our Litigation Tracker

Svitlana Doe v. Noem (District Court)

Svitlana Doe v. Noem (Court of Appeals)

Noem v. Svitlana Doe (Supreme Court)

 

Scroll to Top